The classic: root 72
sqrt(72)72 = 2 cubed x 3 squared. The pairs are 2x2 and 3x3, which send a 2 and a 3 outside, leaving one 2 inside. So root 72 = 6 root 2, and squaring it back gives 36 x 2 = 72.
Simplify, combine and rationalize radicals - the answer is a form, not a decimal.
Last updated
The Coddy math course teaches the method itself - you work each step on an interactive board and get told exactly where a move went wrong.
A calculator will tell you that the square root of 72 is 8.4852814. That is almost never the answer a radical question wants. What it wants is 6 times the square root of 2 - the same quantity written so that nothing perfect is left hiding under the sign. That difference is the whole subject: simplifying a radical is a rewrite, not an evaluation, and a decimal throws away the exactness you were being asked to keep.
Everything on this page is exact. The square root of 72 is 6 root 2, the cube root of 54 is 3 cube-root 2, the square root of two thirds is root 6 over 3, and one over two plus root 3 is exactly 2 minus root 3. A decimal is offered beside each answer, clearly labelled as an approximation, because sometimes you do want to know roughly how big the thing is - but it is never handed to you instead of the answer.
Three questions share this page because they share one skill. Simplifying finds the largest perfect power inside the radicand. Adding tells you whether two radicals are like terms, which you cannot know until both are simplified. Rationalizing moves a root out of a denominator using either the root itself or the conjugate. All three come down to the same rule: a root of a product is the product of the roots.
Write the number under the sign as a product of primes. For 72 that is 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 x 3, or 2 cubed times 3 squared. Doing this first means you never have to guess whether a perfect square is hiding in there.
For a square root, gather the primes into pairs; for a cube root, into triples. In 72 the pairs are 2 x 2 and 3 x 3, and one 2 is left over on its own.
Each pair contributes a single copy of that prime outside the radical. The pair of 2s gives a 2 and the pair of 3s gives a 3, so 6 comes out, and the lonely 2 stays underneath: 6 root 2.
If a denominator is left inside, multiply the inside top and bottom by whatever makes the bottom a perfect power. For two thirds, multiply by 3 over 3 to get 6 over 9, and root 6 over 3 comes out.
6 root 2, squared, is 36 times 2, which is 72. That check catches the most common error in one line - taking out too small a factor leaves a square that is short of the radicand.
The cases that come up most, with the perfect power that does the work named in each one.
| Radical | Perfect power inside | Simplest form | Approximately |
|---|---|---|---|
| √8 | 4 | 2√2 | 2.828 |
| √12 | 4 | 2√3 | 3.464 |
| √18 | 9 | 3√2 | 4.243 |
| √32 | 16 | 4√2 | 5.657 |
| √50 | 25 | 5√2 | 7.071 |
| √72 | 36 | 6√2 | 8.485 |
| √(2/3) | none - clear the 3 | √6 / 3 | 0.816 |
| ∛54 | 27 | 3∛2 | 3.780 |
| 3 / √2 | none - rationalize | 3√2 / 2 | 2.121 |
| 1 / (2 + √3) | none - conjugate | 2 - √3 | 0.268 |
sqrt(72)72 = 2 cubed x 3 squared. The pairs are 2x2 and 3x3, which send a 2 and a 3 outside, leaving one 2 inside. So root 72 = 6 root 2, and squaring it back gives 36 x 2 = 72.
3*sqrt(8)Simplify the radical first: root 8 is 2 root 2. Then multiply the coefficients: 3 x 2 = 6, so the answer is 6 root 2. The coefficient never goes under the sign.
sqrt(8) + sqrt(18)Neither term mentions root 2 until you simplify: root 8 is 2 root 2 and root 18 is 3 root 2. Now they are like terms, so add the coefficients: 5 root 2.
sqrt(8) + sqrt(27)Simplified, these are 2 root 2 and 3 root 3. Different numbers under the signs means they are not like terms, so 2 root 2 + 3 root 3 is the answer - there is nothing left to do.
3/sqrt(2)Multiply top and bottom by root 2. The value does not change, because root 2 over root 2 is 1, and the bottom becomes 2. The answer is 3 root 2 over 2.
1/(2 + sqrt(3))Multiply top and bottom by 2 minus root 3. The bottom is then 2 squared minus root 3 squared, which is 4 - 3 = 1, so the whole thing is exactly 2 - root 3.
A radical is in simplest form when the number under the sign has no perfect-power factor left in it, no fraction inside the sign, and no radical in a denominator. So 6 root 2 is simplest form and 2 root 18 is not, even though they are the same number.
Factor the radicand into primes, gather the primes into pairs, and send one copy of each pair outside the sign. Anything unpaired stays underneath. Root 72 becomes 6 root 2 because 72 is 2 cubed times 3 squared.
Because a decimal is an approximation and a radical is exact. Root 2 has no finite decimal, so 1.414 is already wrong in the fourth place; exam answers, further algebra and any later cancellation all need the exact form to stay correct.
Only when the numbers left under their signs are the same after simplifying, and the indexes match. Then they behave exactly like x + x: add the coefficients and keep the radical. Root 8 plus root 18 is 5 root 2; root 8 plus root 27 cannot be combined at all.
If the denominator is a single root, multiply the top and bottom by that root. If it is a sum or difference like 2 plus root 3, multiply by its conjugate, 2 minus root 3 - the difference of squares that follows has no root in it. Either way you are multiplying by 1, so the value never changes.
The same two terms with the sign between them flipped: the conjugate of 3 minus 2 root 2 is 3 plus 2 root 2. Multiplying a binomial by its conjugate gives a difference of squares, and squaring a square root removes it - which is what clears the denominator.
Yes, any index from 2 to 6. The rule generalises: under a cube root you look for triples of equal primes rather than pairs, so the cube root of 54 is 3 cube-root 2 because 54 is 27 times 2.
It does - they are the same number, and neither is in simplest form. The square root of the fraction 2/3 equals √2 divided by √3, and multiplying top and bottom by √3 gives √6 over 3, which has no root in the denominator and is the finished answer.